Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Baptist Neo-Orthodoxy
Post-liberal Christian Anarchism in the Baptist Tradition
Introduction
Post-liberal Baptist theology, deeply influenced by Karl Barth's critique of theological liberalism and his emphasis on divine revelation, offers a unique perspective that bridges traditional Baptist principles with post-liberal theological insights. This approach maintains the Baptist emphasis on individual faith and congregational autonomy while embracing key aspects of post-liberal thought.
Barth's rejection of foundationalism and his focus on divine revelation as the primary source of theological understanding resonate strongly with Baptist theology. This alignment is evident in the Baptist approach to scripture, where divine revelation is encountered individually but contextualized within the faith community. Group Bible studies, sermons, and communal worship shape individual understanding, reflecting a hermeneutic that aligns with post-liberal theology's emphasis on community-shaped interpretation.
The Baptist tradition of congregational governance and the priesthood of all believers finds new expression in this post-liberal framework. While maintaining the authority of God's revelation, this approach privileges the individual's direct relationship with God without sacrificing the importance of the preacher or the relationships among believers. This balance ensures that individual interpretation is always contextualized and enriched by the communal experience, a key tenet of post-liberal thought.
Existential themes, while not typically emphasized in post-liberal theology, find a place in this Baptist-post-liberal synthesis. The focus on individual authenticity and personal faith, rooted in the Baptist tradition, complements post-liberalism's emphasis on the lived experience of faith within a community. This integration allows for a theology that is both deeply personal and communally shaped.
The narrative aspect of post-liberal theology finds expression in Baptist practices of communal engagement with the biblical narrative. The group Bible study and sermon practices in Baptist churches create a shared engagement with scripture that aligns well with post-liberal theology's emphasis on the importance of narrative in shaping faith and understanding. This approach involves not just studying the biblical narrative, but living it out in community, a key aspect of post-liberal thought.
In terms of political theology, this post-liberal Baptist approach maintains the traditional Baptist emphasis on the separation of church and state, while incorporating elements of Christian anarchism traced back to the Anabaptists and English Separatists. This approach rejects both state authority over religion and the church's coercive power over the state, aligning with the anarchist critique of centralized, coercive authorities.
Rather than relying on state mechanisms or coercive power, it favors the organic development of norms within communities through customary law and mutual aid. This reflects both the Baptist heritage of dissent and the post-liberal emphasis on community-shaped understanding. The approach resonates with naturalistic legal theory, emphasizing the emergence of legal norms from within communities rather than through top-down state impositions.
This Christian anarchist strain in Baptist thought promotes a form of social organization based on voluntary association and consensual forms of community governance. It seeks to embody Christian principles in community life and social engagement without resorting to state power or centralized authority. This aligns with the historical Baptist resistance to both religious and civil authorities, advocating instead for a decentralized, community-based approach to living out Christian values in society.
Phenomenology, Karl Barth, and Baptist Theology
Existential themes, while not typically emphasized in post-liberal theology, find a place in our Baptist-post-liberal synthesis. The focus on individual authenticity and personal faith, rooted in the Baptist tradition, complements post-liberalism's emphasis on the lived experience of faith within a community context. This integration allows for a theology that is both deeply personal and communally shaped.
Karl Barth, one of the most significant theologians of the 20th century, is known for his substantial contributions to dialectical and existential theology. He emerged as a leading figure in Protestant theology, particularly known for his "Church Dogmatics". His break from liberal theology was marked by a return to a theology rooted in the sovereignty and transcendence of God. Barth’s emphasis on the otherness of God and the centrality of divine revelation stood in stark contrast to the anthropocentric tendencies of his time.
Martin Heidegger’s existential phenomenology, along with the broader movement, significantly influenced Karl Barth’s theological project. While Barth’s direct engagement with Heidegger was minimal, the existential themes and philosophical underpinnings of Heidegger’s thought permeated Barth’s approach to theology. This intersection highlights the fruitful dialogue between philosophy and theology in the 20th century, demonstrating how existential phenomenology enriched Barth's understanding of human existence and divine revelation.
Heidegger's existential analysis of human finitude and the quest for authenticity parallels Barth's emphasis on the human need for divine revelation and the inadequacy of human reason in grasping the divine. This is witnessed in several way:
Being, Disclosure, and Revelation: Barth's concept of revelation can be seen as an existential event, where the encounter with the divine reorients human existence, similar to Heidegger's notion of authenticity through confronting one's Being. For Barth, divine revelation is akin to Heidegger's concept of disclosure (Erschlossenheit), where Being itself is unconcealed. However, Barth radically reinterprets this in a theological context: God's self-disclosure in revelation is not merely an ontological event, but a personal, sovereign act of God. This revelation, for Barth, is the ultimate 'unconcealment' that allows humans to understand their true being in relation to God. Just as Heidegger saw Being as the condition for the intelligibility of entities, Barth saw God's self-revelation as the condition for understanding true human existence and the world. This parallel yet distinct understanding highlights how Barth engaged with and transformed Heideggerian concepts in his theological framework.
Temporality, Eschatology, and Eternal Revelation: Heidegger's analysis of temporality influenced Barth's eschatological framework, where the future (in the form of divine promise) plays a crucial role in shaping present existence. Heidegger's analysis of temporality influenced Barth's eschatological framework, but Barth radically reinterpreted this through the lens of God's eternal revelation in Christ. For Barth, God's special revelation in Christ transcends human temporality, existing eternally 'above' past, present, and future. This eternal Word of God intersects with human history, shaping our understanding of past, present, and future simultaneously. While the future (in the form of divine promise) plays a crucial role in shaping present existence, Barth emphasized that this future is always already realized in Christ's eternal election. Thus, Barth's eschatology is not merely future-oriented but grounded in the eternal 'now' of God's revelation, which continually breaks into human time, reorienting our temporal existence towards God's eternal reality.
Critique of Ontotheology: Barth’s critique of natural theology and any attempt to define God within human categories resonates with Heidegger’s critique of ontotheology, where Heidegger argues that traditional metaphysics reduces Being to a mere object of thought.
Human Experience and Theology: Existential phenomenology’s focus on being-in-the-world or lived experience (In-der-Welt-sein) influenced Barth’s approach to theology as a discipline deeply rooted in the human encounter with God. This aligns with phenomenology’s emphasis on describing experiences without preconceived notions.
Faith and Existential Authenticity: The existential concern for authenticity and individual existence found a theological counterpart in Barth’s emphasis on personal faith and the individual's relationship with God.
Existential Themes in Theology: Themes such as anxiety, despair, and hope, central to existential phenomenology, are also prevalent in Barth's theological discourse, reflecting the existential struggles inherent in the human condition before God.
Even though phenomenology does not offer a dialectical theory of nature in the Hegelian or Marxist sense, it does emphasize the dynamic, relational quality of human existence. This is evocative of Platonic/Socratic dialectic. This kind of dialectic often ends without a clear resolution or synthesis. It frequently leaves questions open-ended and aims to stimulate critical thinking or expose flaws in reasoning. It may also lead to aporia (a state of puzzlement or doubt). The dialogues themselves are dynamic, with arguments and counterarguments presented in a fluid, conversational style that encourages ongoing reflection and debate.
Plato's dialectical, narrative open system is evidenced by the way he designs his characters. They are never static mouthpieces for fixed ideas; instead, they are dynamic participants in a dialectical philosophical narrative. This approach reflects the nature of philosophical inquiry itself – a continuous process of questioning, refining, and sometimes revising one's views through interaction with others. Socrates, the central figure in many dialogues, often appears as a questioner, primarily using the elenchus method to expose flaws in others' thinking. However, his role evolved across different works. In some, like "Republic," he begins to present more positive doctrines, such as the Theory of Forms. In others, like "Parmenides," he takes on a less central role, sometimes even being the one questioned. Socrates often tailors his approach based on his interlocutor. For instance, he's gentler with Theaetetus, a young mathematician, compared to his more aggressive stance with sophists like Thrasymachus in "Republic." This adaptability allows for a more nuanced exploration of ideas.
The dialogues are not one-sided, though. Characters often challenge Socrates, forcing him to refine or reconsider his arguments. Glaucon and Adeimantus in the “Republic," for example, pushed Socrates to develop a more comprehensive theory of justice. Some characters, like Parmenides, even take on a Socrates-like role, questioning Socrates himself. As characters interact across dialogues, the philosophical narratives become more complex. Ideas introduced in one dialogue are often revisited and refined in later ones. For example, the concept of anamnesis (recollection) introduced in "Meno" is further developed in "Phaedo." Some characters, like Alcibiades, show development across dialogues, appearing as a young man in "Protagoras" and later with a more mature perspective in "Symposium." The varied viewpoints brought by different characters allowed Plato to explore ideas from multiple angles, contributing to the open-ended nature of philosophical inquiry. This complex interplay between characters allows for various interpretations of Plato's own views, fueling ongoing scholarly debate about his philosophy.
Like Platonic dialogues, phenomenological inquiry doesn't necessarily aim for a final, closed judgment but remains open to ongoing exploration. Both approaches allow understanding or a structured consciousness to emerge through an event-driven process, or time-consciousness, rather than starting with predetermined conclusions. Dialogues allow the reader to witness the unfolding of narrative form in a transtemporal space, like the art of phenomenological reduction as conceived by Husserl, the founder of phenomenology. While Husserl focused more on individual consciousness, the social interaction in Platonic dialogues highlights an important aspect that later phenomenologists like Heidegger would emphasize.
For Husserl, time plays a crucial role in the process of phenomenological reduction. Phenomenological reduction (epoché) suspends or "puts in brackets" our attitude and assumptions about the existence of the external world, as well as the scientific theories, common sense beliefs, or other presuppositions that might influence how we perceive natural phenomena. Husserl's bracketing (epoché) is primarily cognitive. It doesn't physically alter nature or the external world but changes our approach to perceiving and understanding them. Husserl wanted to examine the structures of consciousness and how objects are given to us in experience, rather than making claims about the mind-independent existence of those objects. This is a key aspect of Husserl's method.
In contrast, Heidegger rejected Husserl's method of bracketing (epoché) and instead emphasized our fundamental embeddedness in the world. Heidegger disagreed with Husserl's approach of suspending judgment about the external world. He believed that our existence is inseparable from the world we inhabit. Heidegger introduced the concept of "being-in-the-world" (Dasein), which emphasizes that we are always already situated within a meaningful context. He argued that we can only study our activities by interpreting our contextual relations to things in the world. He focused on our practical activities and engagements with the world. He believed that our more basic ways of relating to things are through practical activities, like hammering, rather than through detached perception. Unlike Husserl's focus on pure consciousness, Heidegger adopted a hermeneutic (interpretive) approach to understanding human existence. He emphasized the importance of interpretation and meaning in our engagement with the world. Heidegger shifted the focus from Husserl's epistemological concerns to ontological questions about the nature of being. He sought to understand the meaning of being through our everyday experiences and practices. Central to Heidegger's philosophy was the concept of Being itself (Sein), which he saw as distinct from particular beings (entities). He argued that Being is not an entity but the condition that allows entities to be intelligible as entities. Heidegger introduced the idea of "disclosure" or "unconcealment" (Erschlossenheit), suggesting that Being reveals itself through our engagement with the world. This disclosure, he believed, is not a cognitive achievement but a fundamental characteristic of our existence, shaping how we understand and interact with the world around us.
Heidegger's approach to temporality was also quite different from Husserl's. For Husserl, sedimentation is a key concept in understanding how knowledge and meaning are built up and preserved historically. He views sedimentation as a process by which lived experiences and cultural meanings gradually settle into layers of established knowledge, forming a foundation for future understanding. This sedimented knowledge becomes part of the "lifeworld" - the shared world of immediate experience that serves as a background for all human activities. Husserl emphasizes that while sedimentation creates a relatively stable structure of meaning, it also allows for ongoing alteration and correction. The sedimented layers of meaning can be "reactivated" through a process of tracing back to their origins, allowing for a critical examination of inherited knowledge. Heidegger, on the other hand, approaches the past and historical understanding differently. While he doesn't reject the idea of accumulated historical knowledge, he is more concerned with how we as beings-in-the-world actively engage with and interpret our historical situation.
For Heidegger, our understanding of the past is not merely a recollection of events but an integral part of how we project ourselves into the future. The past informs our current possibilities and choices, and thus, being-with those in the past involves a recognition of their influence on our present existence. Heidegger discusses how tradition can become "calcified," obscuring our access to the original meanings and experiences that shaped it. To engage authentically with the past, one must critically examine and "destruct" these traditions to uncover the primordial experiences that give rise to our current understanding of Being. Heidegger critiques the "calcification" of tradition, which refers to the rigid and uncritical acceptance of established interpretations that obscure original experiences of Being. This critique is not only directed at historical philosophical traditions but also implies that our own contemporary context can become calcified, limiting our understanding of Being. This process allows us to relate to past figures and ideas in a way that remains relevant to our current context. Heidegger's notion of being-in-the-world suggests that our interactions with others, including those from the past, are always situated within a meaningful context. This embodied engagement allows us to relate to historical figures or ideas not as distant entities but as integral parts of our ongoing narrative. We can engage with their thoughts and actions, interpreting them within the framework of our own experiences.
Heidegger emphasizes the importance of interpretation in understanding historical texts and ideas. This involves a "hermeneutic circle" where we approach past thoughts with our own pre-understandings but remain open to having those understandings transformed through engagement with the text. However, Heidegger's later work also emphasizes embodied, contextual understanding. This suggests that truly grasping past thinkers would necessarily involve imaginatively situating ourselves in their lived world and experiences, rather than treating their ideas as abstract concepts. This is why he values authenticity. Heidegger's concept of authenticity (Eigentlichkeit) involves facing one's own finite existence and possibilities, rather than losing oneself in the anonymous "they" (das Man). Authenticity is about owning one's choices and understanding oneself as a unique being-towards-death.
With Heidegger’s existential phenomenology in mind, the affinity between Karl Barth's theological insights, Baptist tradition, and post-liberal theology has a unique resonance. This synthesis upholds the importance of narrative theology, tradition, community-shaped understanding, and living out the narrative, all within a framework that rejects foundationalism. By maintaining the Baptist emphasis on individual faith and congregational autonomy, this approach can enrich traditional Baptist principles with post-liberal theological insights, offering a robust and dynamic theological framework responsive to contemporary challenges.
Key Concepts in the Baptist Tradition
The Baptist tradition is characterized by several distinctive principles that shape its theological, ecclesiological, and practical outlook. These principles include the priesthood of all believers, congregational governance, believer's baptism, rejection of episcopal authority, and, in some instances, Christian anarchism. This review delves into each of these key concepts, exploring their historical roots, theological underpinnings, and contemporary relevance.
1. Priesthood of All Believers
Historical Roots and Theological Foundations
The concept of the priesthood of all believers is rooted in the Reformation, particularly in the teachings of Martin Luther, who argued that all Christians have direct access to God without the need for a mediating priesthood. Baptists have embraced this doctrine, emphasizing that every believer is equally capable of interpreting Scripture and participating in the church's life and mission.
Implications
This principle democratizes the Christian faith, promoting active lay participation and diminishing clerical hierarchy. It supports the idea that every believer has a ministry and a role within the church, encouraging a more egalitarian and participatory church culture.
2. Congregational Governance
Historical Roots and Theological Foundations
Congregational governance is a hallmark of Baptist polity, where each local church is autonomous and self-governing. This principle is rooted in the New Testament model of the early Christian communities, where decision-making was a collective endeavor.
Implications
This governance model ensures that authority resides within the local congregation rather than being imposed by external bodies. It fosters a sense of responsibility and ownership among church members, who actively participate in decision-making processes, including the selection of pastors, deacons, and other leaders.
3. Believer's Baptism
Historical Roots and Theological Foundations
Believer's baptism, also known as credobaptism, is the practice of baptizing individuals who have professed personal faith in Jesus Christ. This stands in contrast to infant baptism (paedobaptism) and is based on the New Testament accounts of baptism following a personal confession of faith (e.g., Acts 2:41, 8:36-38).
Implications
This practice underscores the importance of personal faith and conscious commitment to Christ. It serves as a public declaration of one's faith and entry into the church community. Believer's baptism also symbolizes the individual's identification with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
4. Rejection of Episcopal Authority
Historical Roots and Theological Foundations
Baptists reject episcopal polity, which involves hierarchical governance with bishops exercising authority over multiple congregations. This rejection is based on the conviction that church authority should not reside in a hierarchical structure but within the local congregation.
Implications
The rejection of episcopal authority aligns with the Baptist emphasis on congregational autonomy and the priesthood of all believers. It prevents the consolidation of power in the hands of a few and promotes a more decentralized and participatory approach to church governance.
Post-Liberal Alignment
Narrative Theology
Narrative theology finds a rich expression in Baptist practices through group Bible studies and sermons. These practices create a communal engagement with the biblical narrative, fostering a collective interpretation of scripture. This communal interpretation aligns with post-liberal theology's emphasis on the importance of narrative in shaping faith and understanding.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
Karl Barth, influenced by Heidegger's concepts of "being-with" (Mitsein) and "being-in-the-world" (In-der-Welt-sein), viewed human existence as fundamentally relational and contextual. "Being-with" underscores that our understanding and identity are formed within the context of our relationships. In a Baptist setting, the communal engagement in Bible study reflects this relational existence. Just as Barth saw divine revelation as an event that occurs within the community, so too does the Baptist tradition see scriptural interpretation as a communal activity, resonating with the post-liberal emphasis on narrative and community.
Uniquely Baptist:
The Baptist tradition of the priesthood of all believers ensures that every individual has the authority to interpret scripture, yet this interpretation is always within the context of the congregation. This collective engagement fosters a deeper, community-shaped understanding of faith, emphasizing the Baptist commitment to both individual and communal aspects of faith.
Tradition
The congregationalist structure itself is a long-standing Baptist tradition that shapes how faith is understood and practiced. The concept of "Being-with" highlights how individual interpretations are influenced by and contribute to an ongoing tradition of communal biblical engagement.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
Barth’s rejection of foundationalism, which posits that human reason alone cannot fully grasp divine truth, parallels Heidegger's existential phenomenology where understanding is always situated within a context. In Baptist tradition, the congregational governance embodies this as decisions and interpretations arise from the community rather than a hierarchical authority. This democratic structure reflects Heidegger’s notion of "being-with," as each member’s contribution is essential to the collective understanding.
Uniquely Baptist:
The Baptist rejection of episcopal authority and emphasis on congregational governance ensure that the community, rather than a single authority figure, shapes the understanding and practice of faith. This aligns with post-liberal theology’s view that tradition and faith are lived out and understood within a community context, making the Baptist tradition a practical embodiment of these theological principles.
Community-Shaped Understanding
The idea that individual interpretation is contextualized by the community resonates strongly with post-liberal theology's emphasis on how faith is shaped within a community context.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
Barth emphasized the importance of divine revelation within a community setting, echoing Heidegger's "being-in-the-world," where one's understanding is always contextual and relational. In the Baptist tradition, group Bible studies, sermons, and general church life shape individual understanding, ensuring that personal interpretations are enriched and corrected within the faith community. This communal shaping aligns with post-liberal theology, which views community as essential in forming theological understanding.
Uniquely Baptist:
The practice of believer’s baptism, which requires a personal confession of faith, demonstrates how personal faith decisions are made within the supportive context of the community. This balance of individual decision and communal validation embodies the post-liberal emphasis on the interplay between personal faith and community context.
Living Out the Narrative
The Baptist approach involves not just studying the biblical narrative but living it out in community, which is a key aspect of post-liberal thought.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
Barth’s theology, deeply influenced by Heidegger’s existential analysis, emphasizes that faith is not just intellectual assent but a lived experience. This is reflected in the Baptist tradition where the biblical narrative is enacted through communal practices such as worship, service, and communal living. This enactment of faith resonates with post-liberal theology’s focus on narrative and community as central to the Christian life.
Uniquely Baptist:
The emphasis on congregational governance and the priesthood of all believers ensures that living out the biblical narrative is a collective effort. The rejection of episcopal authority in favor of congregational decision-making highlights the Baptist commitment to a community-based approach to faith, ensuring that the narrative is not only studied but actively lived out in the community.
Rejection of Foundationalism
Karl Barth's theology rejects foundationalism, emphasizing that human reason alone cannot fully grasp divine truth. Instead, divine revelation through scripture is central, but this revelation, while encountered individually, is contextualized by a faith community.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
Barth’s rejection of foundationalism mirrors Heidegger’s critique of traditional metaphysics, which reduces Being to mere objects of thought. For Barth, divine revelation occurs within the community, where human understanding is limited and always in need of communal correction and enrichment. This is reflected in Baptist practices where group Bible studies and sermons allow for a collective hermeneutic that aligns with post-liberal theology’s emphasis on community-shaped understanding.
Uniquely Baptist:
The Baptist tradition maintains the authority of God's revelation while privileging the individual's direct relationship with God. However, this individual interpretation is always balanced by the community's input, ensuring a dynamic interplay between personal and communal faith. This balance reflects the post-liberal emphasis on community while upholding the Baptist principle of the priesthood of all believers.
Political Action
A true post-liberal Baptist theology, rooted in the Christian anarchist traditions of the English Separatists and Anabaptists, would indeed require a separation of church and state, but not in the sense of submitting to a centralized legal system. Instead, it would advocate for a more decentralized, community-based approach to governance and law.
Consistency with Barth and Heidegger:
While Barth did not leave a formal political theology, phenomenology emphasizes the importance of practical or lived experience as the foundation for understanding human existence and consciousness. For the phenomenologist, political and philosophical concepts must be grounded in the practice of natural living rather than solely in abstract reasoning. This distinction echoes critiques of traditional political philosophy, particularly those made by thinkers like Hannah Arendt. Arendt criticized the tendency of political philosophers to neglect the realm of opinion and common experience in favor of abstract truths. In some ways, Leo Strauss can be understood as using Heidegger to synthesize positions like Arendt's and the ones she critiques, albeit from the perspective of finding inspiration from the past while working to prevent an unpleasant future. Although Strauss didn't practice phenomenology per se, his approach to reading texts does emphasize uncovering meanings from practical context. Strauss believed that timeless political and philosophical meanings could dynamically come to life through conscious engagement with classical texts, considering both the author's historical context and the potential for esoteric writing.
Uniquely Baptist:
Post-liberal theology deems political engagement appropriate as it seeks to integrate religious beliefs into public life, address the perceived moral and social deficiencies of liberalism, and promote a communal and morally grounded society. This approach challenges the liberal separation of religion and politics, advocating for a governance model that reflects religious moral teachings and communal values. However, a Post-liberal Baptist theology, rooted in the priesthood of all believers, would argue that political engagement should focus on empowering local congregations to live out their faith, rather than integrating religious beliefs into state structures. This approach upholds the separation of church and state by emphasizing congregational autonomy and rejecting both state control over religion and religious control over the state. A customary legal system would allow each congregation to develop its own norms and practices over time, reflecting the evolving needs and beliefs of its members. If the community decides to move away from traditional church structures, this system would naturally accommodate such changes without requiring top-down legislation.
Post-liberal theology advocates for political engagement as it seeks to address perceived shortcomings of liberalism, particularly its tendency to prioritize individual autonomy and secularism over communal and moral considerations rooted in religious traditions. This theological approach emphasizes the integration of religious beliefs into public life and governance, arguing that such integration is necessary for achieving a more holistic and morally grounded society. In contrast, rather than addressing liberalism's shortcomings through state mechanisms, post-liberal Baptist theology would advocate for strengthening congregational governance. Each congregation, as a body of equal peers under Christ, would embody Baptist principles and values without imposing them on others through state power. A rudimentary common law system would enable congregations to learn from each other's experiences and adapt their governance structures accordingly. This system would allow for diverse approaches to emerge organically, with successful models naturally influencing others without central imposition.
Post-liberal theology critiques liberalism for promoting a society of atomized individuals, which it argues leads to social fragmentation and moral relativism. By engaging politically, post-liberals aim to counteract this by fostering a sense of community and shared moral values rooted in religious traditions. Although, to counter social fragmentation and moral relativism, post-liberal Baptist theology would propose a renewed emphasis on the local church as a covenant community. This approach fosters shared values and accountability within the congregation, aligning with the Baptist tradition of voluntarism and congregational independence. A customary legal system would allow these covenant communities to develop their own internal dispute resolution mechanisms and ethical standards. Over time, these could evolve into more formal systems of community governance, with or without explicit religious overtones, based on local needs and preferences.
Post-liberal thinkers argue that faith and politics are inherently connected. They believe that religious teachings should inform political decisions to ensure that governance is aligned with moral and ethical principles. This approach rejects the liberal notion of separating religion from public life, instead advocating for a politics that reflects religious moral teachings. While affirming that faith shapes all aspects of life, post-liberal Baptist theology would reject the notion that religious teachings should inform state political decisions. Instead, it would advocate for living out Baptist principles within autonomous congregations, allowing for diverse expressions of faith without state interference. A common law approach would enable communities to develop their own understanding of how faith intersects with public life, creating precedents that could be adopted or adapted by others. This would allow for a natural evolution of church-state relations at the local level, responsive to community needs rather than federal mandates.
Post-liberal theology emerged as a response to the perceived failures of liberalism to address contemporary social and moral issues. By engaging politically, post-liberal theologians aim to offer alternative solutions that are grounded in religious ethics and communal values, rather than the individualistic and secular frameworks of liberalism. However, in response to liberalism's perceived failures, post-liberal Baptist theology would offer solutions grounded in congregational polity and the priesthood of all believers. This might include local, consensus-based decision-making within churches and inter-congregational cooperation for social support, rather than relying on state-level political engagement. A customary legal system would allow these local solutions to develop into more comprehensive community governance structures over time. If successful, these could naturally replace or supplement traditional state functions at the local level, evolving with the community's needs.
Some post-liberal thinkers argue for state-enforced moral regulation to achieve a society that reflects Christian moral teachings. This perspective holds that political engagement is necessary to implement policies that promote a collective moral order, which they believe is essential for human flourishing. Contrary to advocating for state-enforced moral regulation, post-liberal Baptist theology would emphasize the importance of individual conscience and congregational discernment. It would reject coercive state power in favor of voluntary adherence to shared principles within Baptist churches. A rudimentary common law system would allow these principles to evolve into community standards that could be applied more broadly, if the community chooses. This would enable a natural progression from church-based ethics to community-wide norms, without requiring state intervention.
Post-liberal theology challenges the secular foundations of liberalism, arguing that secularism undermines the role of religion in public life. By engaging politically, post-liberals seek to reassert the importance of religious perspectives in shaping public policies and societal norms. While challenging secular liberalism, post-liberal Baptist theology would not seek to reassert religious dominance in state structures. Instead, it would advocate for the freedom of each congregation to order its own affairs and practice its faith, preserving religious liberty for all through a decentralized approach that respects the autonomy of each local church. A customary legal system would allow this principle of religious liberty to naturally extend to other forms of community organization over time. As communities evolve, this system would flexibly accommodate a diversity of belief systems and organizational structures, always prioritizing local autonomy over federal authority.
Political Theology and Christian Anarchism
Christian anarchism, while often associated with figures like Leo Tolstoy, has deep historical roots that trace back to the Anabaptists and English Separatists. These early movements laid the groundwork by challenging religious and civil authorities, advocating for a church free from state control. They were outgrowths of the Protestant Reformation but remained rotted in the early church.
St. Augustine discussed what might be considered political theology extensively in his writings, particularly in his seminal work "The City of God." He believed that all earthly political authority and government was a result of humanity's fallen state after original sin. Government and coercive laws were necessary to restrain evil and maintain order in a sinful world but could never achieve true justice or peace. While recognizing the necessity of earthly government, Augustine was deeply pessimistic about its moral capacity. He saw all political regimes as tainted by human sinfulness and self-love. Only the heavenly city could achieve true justice and virtue. He advocated for church and state to remain "clearly apart in their authority and social responsibilities." The state's role was to ensure freedom, while the church's role was to guide on the proper use of that freedom. The state derived its authority from God to serve this limited purpose. He rejected the classical philosophical view that human virtue and reason alone could create an ideal political society. For Augustine, true justice could only be achieved through divine grace, not human efforts.
Like Augustine, the English Separatist Baptists and Anabaptists believed in the importance of the visible church. They sought separation from state control but did not necessarily reject coexistence with the state. They emphasized the independence of the local church and rejected the idea of a territorial or parish church, insisting that a church is composed only of those who have been gathered by Christ. The Baptists were committed to the autonomy of individual congregations and the principle of religious freedom. They resisted any overarching religious authority and emphasized the right of each local church to govern itself without external interference. They stressed the need for godly lives among their members and insisted on baptism for full membership in the congregation (not attendance). Church discipline was a communal concern, but it was understood that the church would contain both faithful and less faithful members.
Anabaptists: Radical Reformers of the 16th Century
Historical Context and Beliefs
The Anabaptists emerged during the Radical Reformation, a movement that sought to implement a more radical departure from Roman Catholic and mainstream Protestant practices. They are best known for their rejection of infant baptism, advocating for believer’s baptism instead, and their commitment to a literal interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount.
Key Anarchistic Principles
1. Rejection of State Church: Anabaptists opposed the intertwining of church and state, believing that the true church must be a voluntary community of believers separate from state control.
2. Communal Living: Some Anabaptist groups, such as the Hutterites, practiced communal living, sharing possessions and wealth in accordance with the early Christian community described in the Book of Acts.
Notable Figures
· Menno Simons: A key leader whose teachings emphasized pacifism, discipleship, and community, laying the groundwork for what would later be seen as anarchistic principles.
· Jacob Hutter: Founder of the Hutterites, a group that practiced communal living and strict adherence to the teachings of Jesus.
English Separatists: Pioneers of Religious Dissent
Historical Context and Beliefs
The English Separatists arose in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, seeking to separate from the Church of England. They believed in the necessity of a pure, autonomous church free from the corruption and control of the state church.
Key Anarchistic Principles
1. Congregational Autonomy: Like the Anabaptists, the Separatists championed the independence of each local congregation, rejecting the hierarchical structure of the Church of England.
2. Civil Disobedience: The Separatists often found themselves at odds with civil authorities, leading to persecution and exile. Their willingness to suffer for their convictions exemplified a form of passive resistance.
3. Emphasis on Scripture: The Separatists emphasized the authority of Scripture over ecclesiastical and civil authorities, advocating for a return to biblical principles in both church and society.
Notable Figures
· John Smyth: Often considered the founder of the Baptist movement, Smyth advocated for the separation of church and state and believer’s baptism, influencing later Baptist thought.
· Thomas Helwys: A key figure who argued for religious liberty and the separation of church and state, asserting that the government should not interfere in matters of conscience.
Influence on Christian Anarchism
The ideas of the Anabaptists and the English Separatists laid the foundation for later developments in Christian anarchism by:
1. Advocating for Separation from State Control: Both movements emphasized the autonomy of the church and the necessity of separating from state interference, a key tenet of Christian anarchism.
2. Community and Equality: The communal practices and emphasis on equality among believers resonate with anarchistic principles of shared ownership and the rejection of hierarchical authority.
Customary Law and Naturalistic Legal Theory
Christian anarchists, such as the Anabaptists and English Separatists, have historically favored forms of governance and legal theory that are decentralized, community-based, and organic. This inclination aligns closely with versions of naturalistic legal theory, which emphasizes the emergence of legal norms from within communities rather than through coercive state mechanisms. This review explores the principles of naturalistic legal theory, the anarchist rejection of state authority, the concept of customary law, and the naturalistic evolution of common law systems.
Anarchists often reject state authority due to the belief that most individuals do not genuinely consent to be governed by the state. This consent is typically assumed rather than explicitly granted, leading anarchists to view state authority as illegitimate. The Anabaptists and English Separatists, in their historical contexts, resisted the coercive power of both religious and civil authorities, advocating instead for voluntary and consensual forms of community organization.
Certain anarchist thinkers propose the concept of customary law, which arises organically within communities based on mutual aid and reciprocity. Customary law is not imposed by a central authority but evolves through the interactions and agreements of community members. This approach aligns with the practices of early Anabaptist communities, which operated based on shared beliefs and communal decision-making.
Customary law relies on principles of mutual aid and reciprocity, where community members cooperate for mutual benefit. This mirrors the early Christian practice described in Acts 2:44-45, where believers shared their possessions and supported each other. By emphasizing these principles, Christian anarchists advocate for a legal system that fosters community cohesion and collective responsibility.
While English common law, which developed over centuries in England, is not synonymous with customary law, common law did incorporate some elements of custom. Many customary law systems, which often predate formal legal systems, rely heavily on principles of mutual aid and reciprocity within communities. These systems often emphasize cooperation for mutual benefit and social cohesion. Customary law in England dates to the Anglo-Saxon period, where local customs governed various aspects of life, including family rights, ownership, inheritance, contracts, and personal violence. These local customs were recognized and adapted by the Norman conquerors to fit their feudal system. Over time, particularly during the 13th and 14th centuries, these customs were codified and integrated into what became known as the common law of England. The development of common law involved the formal recognition and adaptation of local customs by the judiciary. Judges played a crucial role in this process, interpreting and applying these customs in their rulings, which then set precedents for future cases. This judicial process transformed local customs into a more unified legal system applicable across the country. While custom remains a valid source of law, its practical importance has diminished in favor of statutory and common law, which provide a more uniform legal framework. However, certain customary rights, such as those related to land use and local practices, continue to be recognized under specific conditions.
From a naturalistic viewpoint, legal systems, like other social constructs, evolve over time in response to changing societal needs, cultural shifts, and environmental pressures. The development of common law from customary practices can be seen as an adaptive response to the need for more consistent and widespread application of rules across a growing and centralizing society. Evolution doesn't always mean progress in a straightforward sense. In biological evolution, traits that were once adaptive can become maladaptive as environments change. Similarly, in legal evolution, some aspects of customary law that were discarded might have been beneficial in certain contexts. The formalization of law might sometimes lead to rigidity that fails to account for local nuances that customary law handled well. Legal systems could evolve to become more customary again.
Methodological naturalism, when applied to legal theory, emphasizes empirical inquiry into how laws and legal systems function. This approach rejects traditional conceptual analysis, which often relies on abstract, a priori reasoning. Instead, naturalistic legal theory seeks to understand law through observation, experience, and the integration of insights from various disciplines, such as economics, sociology, psychology, and anthropology.
Naturalistic legal theory often diverges from traditional moral considerations, focusing instead on the practical and procedural aspects of legal systems. This practical focus resonates with anarchist perspectives that prioritize functional and effective community governance over rigid moral or ideological frameworks.
Christian anarchists like the Anabaptists and English Separatists, who resisted both religious and civil authority, naturally align with versions of naturalistic legal theory. Their rejection of state authority and centralized legal systems is grounded in the lack of genuine consent and the coercive nature of state laws. Instead, they advocate for customary law, which emerges organically within communities based on mutual aid and reciprocity. The historical evolution of common law systems, with their reliance on judicial decisions and local customs, provides a naturalistic and decentralized model of legal development that resonates with anarchist principles.
Conclusion
This post-liberal Baptist theology thus offers a rich integration of traditional Baptist principles, Barthian theology, and post-liberal insights. It maintains a strong emphasis on divine revelation and individual faith while recognizing the crucial role of community in shaping theological understanding. This approach allows for a dynamic interplay between individual interpretation and communal context, creating a theology that is both rooted in tradition and responsive to contemporary challenges."
References
Barth, Karl. "Church Dogmatics."
Beasley-Murray, G. R. Baptism in the New Testament. Eerdmans, 1962.
Bender, Harold S. The Anabaptist Vision. Herald Press, 1944.
Brock, Peter. The Political and Social Doctrines of the Unity of Czech Brethren in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries. Springer, 1957.
Durnbaugh, Donald F. The Believers' Church: The History and Character of Radical Protestantism. Macmillan Publishing Company, 1968.
Estep, William R. The Anabaptist Story: An Introduction to Sixteenth-Century Anabaptism. Eerdmans, 1996.
Garrett, James Leo Jr. Baptist Theology: A Four-Century Study. Mercer University Press, 2009.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, 1961.
Heidegger, Martin. "Being and Time."
Johnson, Bruce L. "Heidegger and Theology."
Llewellyn, Karl N. The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. Oceana Publications, 1930.
Lumpkin, William L. Baptist Confessions of Faith. Judson Press, 1969.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.
McBeth, H. Leon. The Baptist Heritage: Four Centuries of Baptist Witness. Broadman Press, 1987.
McCormack, Bruce. "Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology."
Murray, Stuart. The Naked Anabaptist: The Bare Essentials of a Radical Faith. Herald Press, 2010.
Shurden, Walter B. The Baptist Identity: Four Fragile Freedoms. Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 1993.
Tolstoy, Leo. The Kingdom of God is Within You. 1894.
Torbet, Robert G. A History of the Baptists. Judson Press, 1950.
Underhill, Edward Bean. Tracts on Liberty of Conscience and Persecution, 1614-1661. The Hanserd Knollys Society, 1846.
Wright, David F. Baptism: Three Views. IVP Academic, 2009.